Harm Reduction vs. Abstinence-Based Remission: Evidence, Outcomes, & Implications
Harm Reduction vs. Abstinence-Based Remission: Evidence, Outcomes, & Implications
Pricing
Information
Date & Time
-
-
Description
For many decades, complete cessation of alcohol and other drug use was viewed as the most desirable outcome to measure in clinical and public health research. In more recent times, there has been a push to measure other types of outcomes, including reductions in alcohol/drug use and other outcomes relevant to functioning and well-being. This talk discusses the shift in emphasis toward a broader set of measures and examines the clinical and public health utility of these different psychometric approaches as well as empirical data on individuals’ functioning and psychological well-being pertaining to the different outcome types (e.g., abstinent remission vs non-abstinence remission). Implications for clinical care and provider recommendations will be discussed.
Learning Objectives
Participants will be able to:
-
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of different alcohol/drug use outcome metrics
-
Discuss the history and rationale of abstinent/non-abstinent approaches for measuring the effectiveness of clinical care
-
List two quality of life and functioning benefits associated with abstinent remission versus non-abstinent remission
-
Name a major long-term benefit associated with abstinent vs non-abstinent remission
Educational Goal
Target Audience
- Addiction Professional
- Counselor
- Marriage & Family Therapist
- Nurse
- Physician
- Psychologist
- Social Worker
Presenters
Financially Sponsored By
- GXC Events - The Global Exchange Conference